Innovamat Research Lab

Efficacy Studies

We build research-based math programs and constantly gather evidence  on their impact through internal and external research.

How do we measure impact?

We use the effect size to measure the impact of a program or resource. According to Kraft (2020), an average effect size of 0.10 in mathematics curriculum proposals is considered moderate and significant. Our educational resources have demonstrated moderate-to-high positive effectiveness in various studies.

Efficacy Studies

We think that every school deserves to use math programs with proven impact. We are committed to conducting rigorous evaluations across our portfolio.

An independent study evaluates the impact of Innovamat in public schools in Brazil

Germina evaluated the impact of Innovamat in public schools in Rio de Janeiro. After two years of implementation, the study shows significant improvements in mathematics, with an effect size of +0.16σ in 2nd grade and +0.20σ in 3rd grade.

Authors: Marco Antonio Monteiro Villela Pepe, Erica Farias de Ruiz & Daniel Tarcha Munduruca. (Germina)

An independent evaluation analyzes the impact of Innovamat in New Jersey, U.S.

WestEd evaluated the impact of Innovamat in the early elementary grades in New Jersey. After two years of implementation, the study shows significant improvements in mathematics, with an effect size of +0.24 (Hedges’ g).

Authors: Mingyu Feng & Kevin (Chun-Wei) Huang. (WestEd)

Feature Article

Research Paper

Students who use Innovamat achieve better results on an adapted version of the TIMSS test

This peer-reviewed study shows that students who use Innovamat achieve significantly better results, with a large effect size (>0.2).

Authors: Alba Torregrosa, Eudald Correig, Marc Colomer, Albert Vilalta & Marta Herranz.

Feature Article

Research Paper

The aRTIst intervention program improves the performance of students with learning difficulties

This study evaluates an intervention program focused on number sense and finds that underperforming students show a significant improvement in arithmetic fluency (0.6).

Authors: Eudald Correig, Albert Vilalta & Cecilia Calvo.

Feature Article

Research Paper

More than 7,000 teachers share their views on the impact of the Innovamat curriculum

This study examines teachers’ perceptions of the Innovamat curriculum and reveals that their evaluation of it is positive and improves the longer they use it.

Author: Marc Colomer.

Feature Article

Research Paper

The mathematical richness of our teaching guides

This study analyzes Innovamat’s teaching guides using a framework designed to identify mathematical richness, and identifies elements of richness and opportunities for improvement.

Authors: Albert Vilalta, Jordi Deulofeu & Laura Morera.

Feature Article

Research Paper

The longer students use our resources, the better their academic performance

With a sample of more than 70,000 students, this study examines the relationship between years of use and academic performance. It shows that using the curriculum for 1–2 years is associated with better performance (moderate effect >0.1).

Authors: Marc Colomer, Eudald Correig & Iker Garcia.

Brief Summary

Results of the psychometric validation of the ConMat tests

Authors: Marc Colomer & Arnau Lagarda (IDIBELL).

Feature Article

Technical document

A comparison of attitudes toward mathematics in Middle School based on the use of Innovamat

Authors: Eudald Correig & Marta Herranz.

Brief Summary

Theoretical foundations

Grounded in research. Built for the classroom.

The scientific evidence behind our math programs.

ESSA TIER IV · WHITE PAPER

Mathematics Learning: the evidence behind every instructional decision

We base our resources on educational research. Check out our white paper to learn about the scientific evidence behind our teaching materials.

Select your region

Select state and language

Efficacy Studies

We build research-based math programs and constantly gather evidence  on their impact through internal and external research.

How do we measure impact?

Efficacy Studies

An independent study evaluates the impact of Innovamat in public schools in Brazil

An independent evaluation analyzes the impact of Innovamat in New Jersey, U.S.

Students who use Innovamat achieve better results on an adapted version of the TIMSS test

The aRTIst intervention program improves the performance of students with learning difficulties

More than 7,000 teachers share their views on the impact of the Innovamat curriculum

The mathematical richness of our teaching guides

The longer students use our resources, the better their academic performance

Results of the psychometric validation of the ConMat tests

A comparison of attitudes toward mathematics in Middle School based on the use of Innovamat

Grounded in research. Built for the classroom.

The scientific evidence behind our math programs.

Mathematics Learning: the evidence behind every instructional decision

Reference Institutions

These organizations shape our math didactic principles.

Innovamat Research Lab

In partnership with universities and research centers, we study how math is learned and evaluate the real impact of what we build.

Select your region

Select state and language

Efficacy Studies

We build research-based math programs and constantly gather evidence on their impact through internal and external research.

How do we measure impact?

Efficacy Studies

An independent study evaluates the impact of Innovamat in public schools in Brazil

An independent evaluation analyzes the impact of Innovamat in New Jersey, U.S.

Students who use Innovamat achieve better results on an adapted version of the TIMSS test

The aRTIst intervention program improves the performance of students with learning difficulties

More than 7,000 teachers share their views on the impact of the Innovamat curriculum

The mathematical richness of our teaching guides

The longer students use our resources, the better their academic performance

Results of the psychometric validation of the ConMat tests

A comparison of attitudes toward mathematics in Middle School based on the use of Innovamat

Grounded in research. Built for the classroom.

The scientific evidence behind our math programs.

Mathematics Learning: the evidence behind every instructional decision

Reference Institutions

These organizations shape our math didactic principles.

Innovamat Research Lab

In partnership with universities and research centers, we study how math is learned and evaluate the real impact of what we build.

We build research-based math programs and constantly gather evidence  on their impact through internal and external research.